This posting originally appeared on list-managers. Posts about
majordomo operation should be done to the list
majordomo-users@greatcircle.com and not to list-managers.
In message <9405021448.AA10089@bytepb.byte.com>, Ben Smith writes:
> I seem to have everything (include new-list, more on that)
> working at ronin.com, but am having trouble with the address
> resolution of incoming messages. This appears to be either a
> sendmail or smail problem. Does anyone know where to post
> questions about that. (I do not participate in Usenet).
You could try the Back Bay (as in Back Bay Boston, although we have
members all over New England) syadamin list bblisa@bblisa.org. You can
subscribe using majordomo@bblisa.org. Majordomo-users may also have an
answer if you can describe what is happening.
> Now, back to new-list: I found a bug (at least as far as my Perl
> version is concerned).
What perl version? Nothing I have access to (4.019-4.036) complains
about it. Note that majordomo only is designed to work with 4.035 or
above.
> On line 38, the
> $list = @ARGV[0];
> is incorrect syntax. It should read
> $list = $ARGV[0];
> When addressing elements of a list, the list-name is preceded by
> the $ not the list designator, @.
Yes and no. Technically @ARGV[0] is an array slice of one element,
namely $ARGV[0]. There is however no real reason to have an array
slice there, so I have changed it to a simple variable dereference for
version 1.90.
-- John
John Rouillard
Special Projects Volunteer University of Massachusetts at Boston
rouilj@cs.umb.edu (preferred) Boston, MA, (617) 287-6480
===============================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.
|
|
