Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(May 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: lost bounced messages
From: "John P. Rouillard" <rouilj @ terminus . cs . umb . edu>
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 11:56:46 -0400
To: Jack Churchill <Jack . Churchill @ dem . csiro . au>
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 May 1994 17:39:40 +1000." <Pine.3.07.9405191734.A19746-a100000@digi.syd.deg.csiro.au>


In message <Pine.3.07.9405191734.A19746-a100000@digi.syd.deg.csiro.au>,
Jack Churchill writes:
> Finally fixed the problem I've been having although I don't fully
> understand why.  The Precedence: bulk header was causing IDA sendmail to
> junk the mail.  A message kept coming from IDA sendmail "Dumping junk
> mail" when executed in verbose mode.  By removing the Precedence header
> the bounced messages got through.
> 
> Is there any penalty leaving out the precedence header? 

I should have figured. No there is no penalty other than not receiving
the bounce messages.

				-- John
John Rouillard

Special Projects Volunteer	University of Massachusetts at Boston
rouilj@cs.umb.edu (preferred)	Boston, MA, (617) 287-6480
==============================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Permission problems on SunOS 4.1.3_U1
From: Frank Scholtens <frank@elsevier.nl>
Next: [no subject]
From: Stephen Frazier <steve@research1.bryant.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: lost bounced messages
From: Jack Churchill <Jack.Churchill@dem.csiro.au>
Next: Quick Question
From: Paradise Cowgirl <minerva@teleport.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com