Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Addressing problem
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ unpc . queernet . org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:43:15 -0700
To: "Dougal Campbell" <Dougal @ multi . iquest . com>
Cc: bill @ biome . bio . dfo . ca (Bill Silvert), "John P. Rouillard" <rouilj @ cs . umb . edu>, Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com (Majordomo Users)
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:16:43. <9405237724.AA772413403@multi.iquest.com>

> >>Any ideas here?  Oh, I tried the following.  I telnetted to port 25 and 
> >>tried both 
> >>
> >>VRFY m_levasseur%AM%IML3@mr.dfo.ca
> >>and
> >>VRFY phycotoxins-outgoing
> >>
> >>giving
> >>
> >><m_levasseur%AM%IML3@mr.dfo.ca>
> >><m_levasseur%AM%IML3@mr.dfo.ca (Maurice Levasseur)>
> >
> >I don't know. Try stripping the comment (in parens ()) from the end of his 
> >address on the list, and see what happens.
> >
> >-- John
> >John Rouillard
> 
>I just wanted to second John's suggestion.  I had a strange problem with 1.62
>a few weeks ago where mail was delivered to some addresses but not others.  I
>finally figured out that the people who weren't getting mail from the list all 
>had comments.  I manually edited the list to remove all the comments and 
>suddenly all users started getting the mail.
>
>I posted a question here related to the issue, and the only real response I 
>got was from a gentleman who said that there might be a bug in smail/sendmail
>(our site uses smail, but this might hold true for sendmail as well) such that 
>when passed a list, it expects the addresses to all be in the same format, 
>which it assumes from the first address passed.  I have no idea of the 
>validity of this theory, and I've not done any testing.  All I know is that 
>when I removed the comments from my address list, the list traffic started 
>acting properly.
 
It is a very well-known feature (but apparently not to you ;-)  of smail
that lists are treated as if they were a single header.

For example,

	To: clowns

where /usr/lib/smail/lists/clowns looks like

	bozo
	krusty
	koko

is equivalent to

	To: bozo krusty koko

However, this also means that if the list file contains

	bozo
	"Krusty T. Klown" <krusty>
	koko (Koko The Clown)

it is equivalent to

	To: bozo "Krusty T. Klown" <krusty> koko (Koko The Clown)

...which has a lot of comment and only one address, <krusty>.

End-of-line is not treated as a delimiter.

You may address this either by:

- using the "strip" option of majordomo
- hacking your majordomo code to write commas at the end of each line
---
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                          rogerk@QueerNet.ORG
2215-R Market Street #576         San Francisco, CA 94114       +1 415 ALL-ARFF
"There is only one real blasphemy: the refusal of joy."         -- Paul Rudnick


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: distribution terms of majordomo
From: gds@FICUS.CS.UCLA.EDU (Greg Skinner)
Next: Re: distribution terms of majordomo
From: Brent Chapman <brent@mycroft.GreatCircle.COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re[2]: Addressing problem
From: "Dougal Campbell" <Dougal@multi.iquest.com>
Next: Re: Re[2]: Addressing problem
From: bill@biome.bio.ns.ca (Bill Silvert)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com