Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Addressing problem
From: bill @ biome . bio . ns . ca (Bill Silvert)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 21:34:12 -0300 (ADT)
To: Majordomo-Users @ GreatCircle . COM (Majordomo Users)

>Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:43:15 -0700
>From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@unpc.queernet.org>
> 
>It is a very well-known feature (but apparently not to you ;-)  of smail
>that lists are treated as if they were a single header.

Just to clarify my original posting, we use sendmail, and the result of
a telnet to port 25 is that each address appears on a separate line.
All off the lists on my system contain addresses with "comments" and
this is the only one that causes problems.

Bill
-- 
Bill Silvert at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography
P. O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA B2Y 4A2
InterNet Address: silvert@biome.bio.ns.ca
(the address bill@biome.bio.ns.ca is only for mailing lists)


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: distribution terms of majordomo
From: Brent Chapman <brent@mycroft.GreatCircle.COM>
Next: Re: distribution terms of majordomo
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@vorlon.mankato.msus.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re[2]: Addressing problem
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@unpc.queernet.org>
Next: distribution terms of majordomo
From: gds@FICUS.CS.UCLA.EDU (Greg Skinner)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com