Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1994)

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Suspension?
From: "John P. Rouillard" <rouilj @ cs . umb . edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 1994 14:11:41 -0400
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Jul 1994 09:15:16 PDT." <9407011615.AA11522@dokoka>

In message <9407011615.AA11522@dokoka>, Alan Stebbens writes:
>> I think NOMAIL is a totally redundant feature on a list with open 
>> subscription and unsubscription, but I'm about ready to add it in anyway 
>> just to lower the incoming mail volume.
>If you do, "NOMAIL" should be a synonym for "unsubscribe all"

How about having nomail produces a reply message like:

 # You have been unsubscribed from the lists at
 # when you want to resubscribe, reply to this message, and send the
 # following lines:

	subscribe bblisa-announce
	subscribe bblisa-digest

this way the state stays with the user. If the sent an email in the
first place with a subject line of: 


or something, then they would easily be able to scan the mail
box. It's not perfect but the resources needed to handle the listserv
type NOMAIL and POSTPONE commands just doesn't make any sense in the
world of uncoordinated majordomi.

				-- John
John Rouillard

Senior Systems Consultant (SERL Project) University of Massachusetts at Boston (preferred)            Boston, MA, (617) 287-6480
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.

Indexed By Date Previous: New Perl script: "announce"
From: Alan Stebbens <>
Next: Re: Suspension?
From: (Michael H. Morse)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Suspension?
From: Alan Stebbens <>
Next: Re: Suspension?
From: Brent Chapman <brent@mycroft.GreatCircle.COM>

Search Internet Search