> Yes, and the reason is that any number of us can come up with special-case
> header rewriting, and putting all that stuff in resend isn't the place
> to do it.
>
> Have resend send the messages to an alias for another script that does
> this rewriting. Then you can do whatever you want to your messages, without
> changing resend.
This is adding of complexity that I think is unwarrented, particularly
since resend already munges several of the header lines. It seems to
me that it would be best to keep all the header rewriting in one
place.
This piece of functionality would also help some news-mail gateways
that I run. Currently, mail messages that come in from the newsgroup
go to a -gate address. Replies go back to that -gate address rather
than to the whole list, which isn't the right thing to do.
-David
References:
|
|
