Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Changing "From:" via resend
From: Software Development <junkyard @ primate . wisc . edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 1994 11:26:42 -0500 (CDT)
To: rogerk @ unpc . queernet . org (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Cc: junkyard @ primate . wisc . edu, majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <m0qKaLt-00014wC@unpc.queernet.org> from "Roger B.A. Klorese" at Jul 3, 94 03:49:29 pm

> > > Is there a reason *not* to add a "-F" option that removes the "From:" header
> > > and replaces it?  Are there other headers that should be rewritten or
> > > omitted that are not currectly rewritable?
> > 
> > Yes, and the reason is that any number of us can come up with special-case
> > header rewriting, and putting all that stuff in resend isn't the place
> > to do it.
> 
> The same case can be made for some of the rewrites it *already* does.

That's true.  However, it already does them; those rewrites are already
in the code.  You're proposing a new one.  My argument was that your
proposal can be repeated in an endless variety of ways (particularly the
"Are there other headers that should be rewritten..." part), and the result
of adopting them would be what?  A mess.

Aren't there other tools like procmail that already allow fairly arbitrary
header rewriting?  Why reinvent it in resend?

Paul DuBois
dubois@primate.wisc.edu


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: SMAIl .vs. SendMail
From: Bror Hellman <hellman@proxxi.uf.se>
Next: More Fonter Questions
From: noah@vader.egr.uri.edu (Noah White)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Changing "From:" via resend
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@unpc.queernet.org>
Next: Re: Changing "From:" via resend
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@unpc.queernet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com