Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: reply vs. reply
From: David Barr <barr @ pop . psu . edu>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 1994 18:28:56 -0400
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Jul 1994 12:30:22 CDT." <199407171727.KAA24576@mycroft.GreatCircle.COM>

In message <199407171727.KAA24576@mycroft.GreatCircle.COM>, Larry Sheldon write
s:
>Of the lists I still subscribe-to, this and one other seem to me to
>behave rudely--a reply goes to the author, instead of back to the list.  And
>when I am tired I forget to go to the un-necessaary effort (which is not
>even possible for some of our customers) of examining the headers to see
>where the replay is going to go.

This is the way things are supposed to work.  Most every mail user agent
I have used has two "reply" functions -- one to reply to everyone and
one to reply just to the original sender.  Some il-conceived list software
(cough *LISTSERV* cough) configures things such that you are *forced*
to reply back to the list.  If people's user agents cannot reply to the
list again without doing some work then it's pretty clear that their
software is broken, not Majordomo.

--Dave


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Duplication problem (fwd)
From: Larry Sheldon <lsheldon@bluejay.creighton.edu>
Next: My list of Majordomos
From: Dick Moores <rdm@netcom.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Duplication problem (fwd)
From: Larry Sheldon <lsheldon@bluejay.creighton.edu>
Next: resolving local host names
From: Olly Stephens <olly@zycad.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com