Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Problems with digest and archive functionality
From: Spider Boardman <spider @ Orb . Nashua . NH . US>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 1995 06:10:53 -0500
To: Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn @ cs . bgsu . edu>
Cc: eichin @ cygnus . com, jmb @ kryten . atinc . com, jeff @ pulver . com, majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Feb 1995 19:54:38 EST." <Pine.3.89.9502281950.B17307-0100000@bell>
References: <Pine.3.89.9502281950.B17307-0100000@bell>

>>>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 1995 19:54:38 -0500 (EST), Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn@cs.bgsu.edu> said:

Jeremy> On Tue, 28 Feb 1995 eichin@cygnus.com wrote:
>> At least in sendmail 8, it appears that this is not optional
>> -- I created some new majordomo lists with no subscribers, and
>> got bounces (something about alias loop, I can go back and
>> check) until I actually added at least one person to each
>> list...

Jeremy> Yep, I've had that problem too.  For me, the only
Jeremy> solution was to make sure that there was *someone*
Jeremy> subscribed to every list.

Jeremy> Anyone else know what's up with this?

Yes, for whatever reason, sendmail v8 does demand that the alias
be non-empty.  That's why the ``mklist'' script I made available
in January creates the lists with user "nobody" subscribed to
them.

	--spider

-- 
Spider Boardman (at home)			spider@Orb.Nashua.NH.US
speaking only for myself			...!decvax!orb!spider

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Can MajorDomo do what I want?
From: hal9001@panix.com (Robert A. Rosenberg)
Next: Re: List Capacity
From: Ira Krakow <ikrakow@krakow.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Can MajorDomo do what I want?
From: plate@dicomed.com (Doug Plate)
Next: Re: List Capacity
From: Ira Krakow <ikrakow@krakow.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com