Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(April 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: best way to deliver large lists?
From: Brian Behlendorf <brian @ hyperreal . com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 15:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tom Limoncelli <tal @ big . att . com>
Cc: Kevin at Freeside Support <kevintx @ fc . net>, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM, majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9504121943.AA26473@lexicon.info.att.com>

On Wed, 12 Apr 1995, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> > Does anyone here have suggestions for getting messages out to a large
> > subscriber list (which invariably contains undeliverable addresses that
> > seem to *drag* sendmail's delivery to the entire list down time after
> > time) with a little more efficiency/brains than sendmail has wanted to do
> 
> The standard answer to this question is, "Install Sendmail 8.x
> because it does all the sorting, grouping, etc. that you can
> imagine".  Huge mailing lists suddenly use much less bandwidth
> because of all of this.

Er, yes, it uses ESMTP, but you still have to do delivery to N domains, 
and given that it takes an average of M seconds per domain (which 
given a fat enough pipe doesn't vary with what else is going over 
that pipe) that's N*M seconds to complete the job.  A better solution is 
to split up the lists into X well-balanced sublists, so that delivery 
takes N*M/X seconds instead (modulo variations in delivery time based on 
what heuristic you used to create those sublists).  Sounds like that's 
what bulk_mailer does.

	Brian


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Quoted names in majordomo
From: Paul-Joseph de Werk <paul%av2.vrx.vhi.com@vhipub.vhi.com>
Next: majordomo with MMDF
From: Mickey Baker (SESI) <mpb@mpbws.redstone.army.mil>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: best way to deliver large lists?
From: tal@big.att.com (Tom Limoncelli)
Next: majordomo1.92, Solaris2.4, perl5.001
From: ema@bom.gov.au (Lena Mayevsky)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com