Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: wrapper ownership with Linux
From: Robb Shecter <rshecter @ seine . ed . umuc . edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 11:15:37 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Steve MacLeod <smacleod @ sparc . uccb . ns . ca>
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.3.89.9507041735.A7604-0100000@sparc>

Yup - Linux is POSIX.


On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Steve MacLeod wrote:

> 
> Hi All
> 
> I run Linux 1.2.5, it is supposed to be POSIX compliant, I assumed that 
> meant the wrapper needed the POSIX options ... is this necessary with Linux?
> 
> I tried as majordomo.majordomo but the wrapper could not run sendmail 
> then, even with Tmajordomo in sendmail.cf
> 
> Some of the message I have seen on this list indicate that suid root on 
> wrapper might not be necessary.
> 
> Which is the case ... POSIX ... to be or not to be<g>?
> 
> Best Regards
> sm
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve MacLeod    Microcomputer Specialist          (902)539-5300x625
> Computer Centre  University College of Cape Breton
> Sydney, N.S.     Fax (902)562-0119                 Canada  B1P 5S2
> 

-
Robb Shecter
University of Maryland, European Division
Computer Operations



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Please Help with modifying resend to split up list
From: dan@kypris.com (Daniel A. Nichols)
Next: Majordomo 1.93 on Solaris 2.4
From: sg@xptsst1.ExperTeam.de (Stephan Gerle)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: wrapper ownership with Linux
From: Robert Hart <hartr@hedland.edu.au>
Next: Allowing user aliases or anonymous messages ..Possible?
From: Steve MacLeod <smacleod@sparc.uccb.ns.ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com