Hi - I'm not a subscriber to the majordomo-users list so I hope you all
don't mind this submission ...
I like the feature of the recent majordomo versions which keeps
most "administrative" requests out of mailing lists by bouncing them
to the list-owner. However it does seem to a little on the
anal retentive side. For example I haven't been able to get the
attached posting out! Is there a way for the list-owner to over-ride
this check?
My apologies if this is a FAQ or a configuration option I
have over-looked.
Thanks in advance.
Bill
p.s. I am using majordomo version 1.93
owner-ford-probe@bh.org wrote this:
> From owner-ford-probe@bh.org Sat Jul 29 08:47:55 1995
>
> >From bill@bh.org Sat Jul 29 08:47:29 1995
> Received: (from bill@localhost) by bhhome.bh.org (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA00513; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 08:47:28 -0400
> From: Bill Heiser <bill@bh.org>
> Message-Id: <199507291247.IAA00513@bhhome.bh.org>
> Subject: Probe List Info
> To: XXXXX@netcom.com
> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1995 08:47:27 -0400 (EDT)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 820
>
>
> XXXXX XXXX wrote this:
> >
> > I propose that the intro doc. be sent out every month w/ the subject
> > "UNSUBSCRIBE AND PROBE INFO". ppl who get annoyed can use a mail filter
> > to filter out this particular mail if they wish.
>
> I will try to send it out monthly with the Subject "Ford Probe List Charter".
> BTW this info is automatically sent to every new subscriber, so I am hard
> pressed to understand why people insist on sending administrative
> requests to the mailing list! I urge everyone to think twice before
> doing so, because there are now nearly 400 subscribers on the list!
> Sending that kind of stuff to that many people around the globe is a
> serious waste of bandwidth!
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bill Heiser
> Ford Probe mailing list & WWW site administrator
--
Bill Heiser: bill@bh.org http://www.bh.org/
|
|
