Majordomo-Users: Re: URGENT -- SOLVED Problem getting majordomo 1.93 to work with Linux 1

Majordomo-Users
(February 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: URGENT -- SOLVED Problem getting majordomo 1.93 to work with Linux 1.3.59
From:	Chris Dollmont <chris @ infostream . ab . ca>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:13:10 +0000 ( )
To:	Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
Cc:	"George R. Kasica" <georgek @ pmihwy . com>, majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.960213075622.483F-100000@bifrost.paladin.com>



On Tue, 13 Feb 1996, Chris Woods wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, George R. Kasica wrote:
> 
> > Thanks to Stephen Haworth of IntelliSTAR in Orlando FL for helping fix
> > the problem:
> 
> > Make sure you change the Makefile to comment out the POSIX section,
> > and un-comment the NON-POSIX section before you make.  Also, make sure
> > you've got the latest supported copy of PERL (v5.001m).
> 
> And it still worked? Wow, that's completely bogus. Linux is a POSIX-ish
> system, and therefore should use the POSIX section of the Makefile. 
> 

Yup. Just checked my Linux setup, and it's definitely the Posix section 
being used...

Chris

References:

Re: URGENT -- SOLVED Problem getting majordomo 1.93 to work with Linux 1.3.59
From: Chris Woods <cjwoods@Paladin.COM>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Only allow list members to post? From: "Kenneth C. Rich" <kenr@bridge.cc.rochester.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Local configuration error From: Philip Johnson <pjohnson@iquest.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: URGENT -- SOLVED Problem getting majordomo 1.93 to work with Linux 1.3.59 From: Chris Woods <cjwoods@Paladin.COM>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Huh? From: John-David Childs <jdc@ism.net>