Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Majordomo 1.93 resend broken broken...
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy @ ki . net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 14:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: Brian Tao <taob @ io . org>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM, majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960414234048.20745v-100000@zap.io.org>

On Sun, 14 Apr 1996, Brian Tao wrote:

>     This appears to be a problem if you put the "Approved:" header as
> the first line of the body rather than inside the header block.
> You'll notice that resend incorrectly rewrites some headers after the
> text of the message (the Sender header, in this case).
>
>     The problem is more obvious if you send an approved message
> consisting of more than one paragraph.  From what I remember of the
> problem, all text up to the first blank line *after* the blank line
> that separates the Approved: line from the rest of the message is
> included in the header block.
>
>     I didn't notice this problem until recently since I always use a
> proper Approved header, rather than an Approved line in the message
> body.

	Check out the patch to resend I sent out a day or so after
my sending this out...so far, the list that we have that is moderated
seems to be working fine.  I thought I sent it to this list as well, but
I posted it to comp.mail.list-admin.software.

Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: eval of majordomo.cf fails
From: kenw@ihs.com
Next: limit commands and posting?
From: Travis Weller <tcweller@austin.metrowerks.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Majordomo 1.93 resend broken broken...
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
Next: Re: Majordomo 1.93 resend broken broken...
From: ckk@uchicago.edu

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com