Majordomo-Users: explicitly set permissions on wrapper?

Majordomo-Users
(June 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	explicitly set permissions on wrapper?
From:	jason @ 3ws . com (Jason Burns)
Date:	Thu, 6 Jun 1996 08:48:56 -0700
To:	"P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia-Asesor" <palopez @ colciencias . gov . co>
Cc:	majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	"P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia-Asesor" <palopez@colciencias.gov.co>
References:	<Pine.GSO.3.93.960606065819.5155A-100000@colcig1000>

I tried it with both POSIX and non POSIX settings. In just hacking away at this
 tried to chmod 4755 the wrapper binary and that is when it started complaining
about the POSIX settings. Are you not supposed to set the wrapper permissions?
If not it it is just 755 (rwxr-xr-x). What are the permisions supposed to be on
the wrapper?

Jason



-- 
Jason Burns	         E-mail: jason@3ws.com
Webmaster	         3rd Wave Solutions

References:

Re: Same errors even using POSIX settings
From: "P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia-Asesor" <palopez@colciencias.gov.co>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Resend_Host From: Tom Seiler <tseiler@dialcorp1.dialcorp.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Again...Run error on LINUX From: David Standish <dstandsh@edu.gov.on.ca>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Same errors even using POSIX settings From: "P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia-Asesor" <palopez@colciencias.gov.co>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	wrapper bug in 1.93 (was: Same errors even using POSIX settings) From: Cameron Simpson <cameron@research.canon.com.au>