-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "SG" == Stephen Graham <graham@ee.washington.edu> writes:
SG> RFC 822 requires Return-Path to be set to the originator. Reply-To
SG> can be set to anything. Here's the relevant portion of the RFC:
Not quite. Reply-To must point to a valid Internet mailbox, and it is
set by the originator of a message. Check the definition of the header
and compare it with the definition of the Sender header.
[...]
> The "Reply-To" field is added by the message
> originator and is intended to direct replies.
SG> Setting Reply-To to the list name is an example of the third case above.
The message *originator*, the author, setting Reply-To is an example of
the third case. The message *sender*, Majordomo, setting Reply-To is a
violation of all three cases because it is not the originator.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMdLlN56VRH7BJMxHAQHyQAP+OZWDmm2pvDmaGmNN/tShmouwcy0BVo8v
aHG3WZIG8LVH1uIMm6R1ioY76iHbxNP0NswXsnqIY1tPTFwOoSshWhM3jsqgzyAN
z/Xvux4snDRDOysCbs3JzjXHd40vw2Jc7nKFUuIigK376lJRBllm4/zQBd3L1eLP
gbW6rqKpYEQ=
=Dn0e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Richard Pieri/Information Services \ When in doubt, cop an attitude. -A cat's
<ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu> \ guide to life
http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/ \
References:
-
Re: Reply-To
From: graham@ee.washington.edu (Stephen Graham)
|
|
