Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Reply-To
From: graham @ ee . washington . edu (Stephen Graham)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 15:16:39 -0700
To: Majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM

At 3:47 PM 27/6/96, Richard Pieri wrote:
>>>>>> "SG" == Stephen Graham <graham@ee.washington.edu> writes:
>SG> RFC 822 requires Return-Path to be set to the originator. Reply-To
>SG> can be set to anything. Here's the relevant portion of the RFC:
>
>Not quite.  Reply-To must point to a valid Internet mailbox,

list-addresses are valid Internet mailboxes.

> and it is
>set by the originator of a message.

In this case, the originator of the message is MajorDomo. Consider this
passage from 822:

        This field [Sender] contains the authenticated identity  of  the  AGENT
        (person,  system  or  process)  that sends the message.  It is
        intended for use when the sender is not the author of the mes-
        sage

You may be the author of the message, but you didn't originate the message.
You did not send the message to me; you sent it to
majordomo-users@greatcircle.com. The MajorDomo program at greatcircle.com
sent the message to me.

There's no violation of RFC 822.

---
Stephen Graham
graham@ee.washington.edu
graham@cs.washington.edu




Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Reply-To
    From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>
Indexed By Date Previous: setting subject prefix
From: Deonne Kahler <actionpatch@earthlink.net>
Next: Re: setting subject prefix
From: Deonne Kahler <actionpatch@earthlink.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Reply-To
From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>
Next: Re: Reply-To
From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com