At 11:01 AM 6/28/96, Richard Pieri wrote:
>>>>>> "SG" == Stephen Graham <graham@ee.washington.edu> writes:
>
>SG> In this case, the originator of the message is MajorDomo.
>
>So, what you are telling me is that I did not originate this message,
>Majordomo@greatcircle.com did. That is ludicrous. The originator is
>the agent which composes the message. The sender is the agent which
>submits the message to the transfer agent. Unless you can point me to
>something which superceeds this, this is what RFC-822 says on the
>subject.
Sorry, I disagree with you. My reading of RFC 822 supports the assignment
of Reply-To by Majordomo. This is also standard convention, followed by
all mailing-list software that I'm aware of.
Essentially, I don't see why you're so very concerned about this. Humans
still have ultimate control over who their e-mail goes to, regardless of
the setting of Reply-To.
Stephen Graham
graham@ee.washington.edu
graham@cs.washington.edu
Follow-Ups:
-
Re: Reply-To
From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>
-
Re: Reply-To
From: michael satterwhite <satterwh@netcom.com>
|
|
