So, basically, the RFC is sort of like ANSI. Just an accepted
standard practice without any basis in legalities, right?
The letter saying that the Reply-To = <listname> violates that
standard almost made it sound like it is illegal to set something
like that up.
<hehe> Better watch out, everyone. The RFC Secret Police <related
to the Fashion/Phone/Matress Police> are out to get anyone violating
an RFC. Even if it IS the one about Datatransmissions and Avian
Carriers. @=)
Brandie T
66 Prydonian Ave (Time/Space Coordinates Optional)
c/o Dr. J. Smith // "I wanted to tell the truth, but my nose
Panoptican, Gallifrey // wouldn't let me!" Pinocchio:The Disclaimer
How do you write? You sit down and do it. How do you live? Don't die.
Follow-Ups:
-
Re: RFC
From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>
|
|
