Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Stability of 1.94b1
From: Warren Milburn <warren . milburn @ mari . co . uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 19:15:00 +0100
To: Majordomo-Users <Majordomo-Users @ GreatCircle . COM>


I've struggled along with the rest of Joe public with installations of 1.93 
and 1.94a9, and just about managed to get both working to a reasonable 
degree.  I want to have a look at 1.94b1; and will be using Solaris 2.4 on a 
Sparcstation 5 with perl5.002.  Does anyone have any comments on the 
stability, so far, of 1.94b1?  Are there any major booboos that I should be 
aware of?  Where am I most likely to run into trouble?  Have any patches 
been produced to cover bugs so far?

Oh yeah, just one last one thing.  Brent got a bit upset about people 
discussing 1.94a9 here in the users list, and it was suggested that 
discussion of 1.94a9 take place in the workers list.  I tried this to find 
the answer to a problem, and even offered to help where I could, but 
received no answers.

It's rather academic now, but I would still like to know if there was a 
problem with the index command in 1.94a9, what it was and whether it was 
patched before the b1 release?  (My 1.94a9 would archive and get but would 
not index - invalid command error).

Regards

Warren

Indexed By Date Previous: Permission problems!
From: Tim Page <tim@firkin.mailmktg.com>
Next: Sorry about the second post
From: "Neil O'Brien" <obrien@east.alsys.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Permission problems!
From: Tim Page <tim@firkin.mailmktg.com>
Next: Sorry about the second post
From: "Neil O'Brien" <obrien@east.alsys.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com