Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(October 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Approving Messages on Moderated Lists
From: wmcguire @ cybercom . net (Wayne McGuire)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:21:02 GMT
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com

This should be my very last beginner's question on how
to use majordomo to manage moderated lists remotely
from the Windows 95 environment.

Here is the typical header information that might appear
in a message bounced for approval:

--- BEGIN ---

>From dreamwave-owner  Mon Oct 14 15:10:14 1996
Received: from mfd-dial1-4.cybercom.net (mfd-dial1-4.cybercom.net [206.28.134.36]) by
kalypso.cybercom.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA29759 for <dreamwave@cybercom.net>; Mon, 14 Oct
1996 15:10:13 -0400
From: pleonard@cybercom.net (Phil Leonard)
To: dreamwave@cybercom.net
Subject: Re: geocities page evil
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:10:13 GMT
Message-ID: <32678f5e.14394036@mail.cybercom.net>
References: <199610141857.OAA28831@kalypso.cybercom.net>
In-Reply-To: <199610141857.OAA28831@kalypso.cybercom.net>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99f/32.299
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--- END ---

Where is the optimal location to place the Approved: Password
information?

Which header information can be safely edited out, or should
be edited out?

Will majordomo automatically replace the BOUNCE subject
header with the correct subject header?

I am using Windows 95 and the mail reader Agent to try to
manage these bounced messages for approval. Apparently
I have to turn off my usual sig, or it will appear in the
approved message. Apparently I also have to reset my
usual line length formatting of 55 for each approved
message, otherwise messages with a line length of
greater than 55 will appear mangled.

Has anyone here worked out a nice neat routine for
handling the approval of messages with a Windows 95
mail reader? On a mailing list with a large volume of 
messages, all of these manual operations could become
burdensome, to say the least.



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Subject parsing
From: Elizabeth Lear <eliz@world.std.com>
Next: bounce with Message too long (>40000) error
From: opi@CellNet.com (Lance Murayama x6096)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Majordomo vs. Listserv
From: "A. Lester Buck III" <buck@Compact.COM>
Next: Re: Approving Messages on Moderated Lists
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com