Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: 1.94 resend options fail?
From: David Grant <david @ lambton . on . ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 16:24:39 -0500 (EST)
To: Majordomo users <majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com>
Cc: David Grant <david @ lambton . on . ca>

I'm trying to upgrade from 1.93 to 1.94 on a DEC OSF/1 v2.0 box.

The majordomo script seams to work fine, but the resend script
barfs on its options.  I've tried upgrading perl to 5.003 (from
5.001i) but still now luck.  Here is the alias line (which works 
fine under 1.93):

test:   "| /usr/local/majordomo-1.94/wrapper resend -l test 
             -r test -h lambton.on.ca -s test-outgoing"

and here is what I get:

#  sendmail -v test
test... aliased to "| /usr/local/majordomo-1.94/wrapper 
       resend -l test -r test -h lambton.on.ca -s test-outgoing"  
Subject: test

Here is a test
^D

"| /usr/local/majordomo-1.94/wrapper resend -l test -r test -h
lambton.on.ca -s
test-outgoing"... Connecting to  (prog)...
about to exec
Array found where operator expected at (eval 9) line 1, near
"david@lambton"
lambton.on.ca... User unknown
Mailer /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-test@lambton.on.ca test -h
lambton.on.ca -s
 test-outgoing exited unexpectedly with error 17152
ABORT Mailer /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-test@lambton.on.ca test -h
lambton.on
.ca -s test-outgoing exited unexpectedly with error 17152"|
/usr/local/majordomo
-1.94/wrapper resend -l test -r test -h lambton.on.ca -s test-outgoing"...
Sent
#

If I take out all the options but the -l listname it seams to
work although I still get the message about 'array found where
operator expected'.

Forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I couldn't find anything in the
docs, and I don't know where a searchable index for the archives is.

Ideas anyone?
Dave
-----
David Grant <david@lambton.on.ca>   VE3DGR   +1 519 542-7751 x348
Lambton College, Sarnia, ON, CANADA          +1 519 542-6667  FAX



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: member count for 1.93
From: "Dennis Black" <Dennis.Black@UAlberta.CA>
Next: Does perl 5.001 unoff. patch 1m count as being better than 5.001e?
From: Zach Nobel <zach@crest.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Problem with majordomo
From: Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu>
Next: Re: 1.94 resend options fail?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com