Here is the actual content of such a message, after approval : (the list
name is "marben")
==========================
Received: from fresco.marben.be by tarifa via ESMTP
(940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
id RAA06896; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:42:00 +0100
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by fresco.marben.be (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
RAA22634 for marben-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:45:21 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:45:21 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199611151645.RAA22634@fresco.marben.be>
From: Jean-Pierre Morant <jpm@marben.be>
Subject: That's the right way to do it.
Apparently-To: <root@marben.be>
Apparently-To: <test@marben.be>
Apparently-To: <jpm@marben.be>
Apparently-To: <fra@marben.be>
Apparently-To: <a@marben.be>
Apparently-To: <fra1@marben.be>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> You don't show us any example headers to see whether or not the header
> is actually getting inserted, but I suspect your problem may be your
> subscribers' mail readers. Some brain dead mailers on toy systems don't
> pay any attention to things like Reply-To, so even if Mj is inserting
> the header it may not make any difference. Look at some real, live
> headers (not with your mail reader, it may be lying) and then decide
> what works and what doesn't.
> --
> Jean-Pierre Morant
> c/o MARBEN S.A./N.V. La vie serait tellement
> Boulevard du Souverain,400, Vorstlaan plus facile
> 1160 Bruxelles Si seulement
> Belgium nous avions les sources....
> + 32 2 663 1130 (phone)
> + 32 2 663 1199 (fax)
> http://www.marben.be
> jpm@marben.be
=======================================
As you can see there is no mention of a "Reply-To: " field....
--
Jean-Pierre Morant
c/o MARBEN S.A./N.V. La vie serait tellement
Boulevard du Souverain,400, Vorstlaan plus facile
1160 Bruxelles Si seulement
Belgium nous avions les sources....
+ 32 2 663 1130 (phone)
+ 32 2 663 1199 (fax)
http://www.marben.be
jpm@marben.be
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
