I received this email, which bounced from the list. This guy hasn't a
valid address anymore. Please check.
Eduardo Palomar
*
On 14 Dec 1996, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
> This is a MIME-encapsulated message
>
> --EAB08238.850532775/krabat.nadir.org
>
> The original message was received at Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:06:14 +0100
> from uucp@localhost
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> majordomo-u@krabat.comlink.de
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> 550 majordomo-u@krabat.comlink.de... User unknown
>
> --EAB08238.850532775/krabat.nadir.org
> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; krabat.nadir.org
> Arrival-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:06:14 +0100
>
> Final-Recipient: X-UUCP; majordomo-u@krabat.nadir.org
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> Last-Attempt-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:06:15 +0100
>
> --EAB08238.850532775/krabat.nadir.org
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
>
> Return-Path: <roentgen.gdl.iteso.mx!epalomar@cl-hh.comlink.de>
> Received: from cl-hh.comlink.de (uucp@localhost)
> by krabat.nadir.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP
> id EAA08238; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:06:14 +0100
> Received: by cl-hh.comlink.de (DUUCP vom 19.09.1996)
> with ZConnect; 12 Dec 1996 22:58:52 +0000
> From: epalomar@roentgen.gdl.iteso.mx (Ing Eduardo Palomar)
> Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.961212224920.22230A-100000@roentgen.gdl.iteso.mx>
> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UC cl-hh.comlink.de [DUUCP BETA vom 19.09.1996], RFC1036/822 UC cl-hh.comlink.de [DUUCP BETA vom 19.09.1996]
> Subject: Re: ABORT problem -- HELP!
> Date: 12 Dec 1996 22:58:52 +0000
> To: majord-u@krabat.comlink.de, majordomo-u@krabat.comlink.de
>
> *
> I had a similar problem (exactly the same happened, even if the reason
|
|
