Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: "trusted users" for commands needing &pproval?
From: "Lazlo Nibble" <lazlo @ swcp . com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 11:09:24 -0700 (MST)
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com (mu)

>> Relying on just the email headers for verification is way too
>> insecure.
> 
> Then why is there a restrict_post feature?

Because allowing someone to post to the list is a lot less dangerous than
allowing someone access to the list's administration commands.

> Since you'd have to know who is a "trusted" user for administrativa...

Oh yeah, that's a tough one -- figuring out who a list's administrator is.

I don't see that giving people the admin password for your list is such a
difficult thing to manage that it would be preferable to introduce this new
security hole into the code.

-- 
::: Lazlo (lazlo@swcp.com; http://www.swcp.com/lazlo)

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: "trusted users" for commands needing &pproval?
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: "trusted users" for commands needing &pproval?
From: richard welty <welty@balltown.cma.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: "trusted users" for commands needing &pproval?
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Error setting up Major Domo
From: "Nels Lindquist" <nels@maei.ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com