Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Upgrading from 1.93 to 1.94.1 cont. Archived digests?
From: Brock Rozen <brozen @ webdreams . com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 16:48:50 -0500 (EST)
To: "Tabor J. Wells" <twells @ shore . net>
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.970211140053.21639w-100000@nsa.ecosoft.com>

On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Tabor J. Wells wrote:

> I want to ensure that when I upgrade from 1.93 to 1.94.1, new digests for
> my lists will continue where the old ones left off. Is this true, or will
> they overwrite the old ones? 

I don't see why not, unless something about the numbering system changed
in the new digest program -- which I'm unsure of.

TO be sure though, I would issue a mkdigest command before switching over.

> Where is the digest issue number determined, BTW?

in the listname-digest.config file

> 


 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 | Brock Rozen | brozen@webdreams.com | http://www.webdreams.com/~brozen | 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Fwd: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 13
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: digest volume numbers
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: digest volume numbers
From: Jerry Peek <jpeek@jpeek.com>
Next: Double "@" in digest headers
From: Martin Voges <voges@drama.unp.ac.za>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com