Majordomo-Users: Re: TLB on BSDI 2.1 system doesn't work 100%

Majordomo-Users
(February 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: TLB on BSDI 2.1 system doesn't work 100%
From:	Dave Barr <barr @ math . psu . edu>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:26:27 -0500
To:	Jim Reisert <jjr @ databook . com>
Cc:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM (MajorDomo Users)
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:43:47 EST." <9702261543.AA04379@sttng.databook.com>
References:	<9702261543.AA04379@sttng.databook.com>

In message <9702261543.AA04379@sttng.databook.com>, Jim Reisert writes:
>Has anyone been though this before on BSDI?  Is there a kernal parameter I can
>change to fix this?

Yes, BSDI is notorous for setting user limits for filedescripters too low.
INN users also run into this regularly.  There's probably a kernel parameter
you can tweak.

--Dave

References:

TLB on BSDI 2.1 system doesn't work 100%
From: Jim Reisert <jjr@databook.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	bulk_mailer and Majordomo From: Jim Reisert <jjr@databook.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	[no subject] From: Michael Milbach <mike@cs.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	TLB on BSDI 2.1 system doesn't work 100% From: Jim Reisert <jjr@databook.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: TLB on BSDI 2.1 system doesn't work 100% From: Allan Sutton <asutton@tenagra.com>