Majordomo-Users: Re: Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid)

Majordomo-Users
(March 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid)
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	09 Mar 1997 20:17:38 -0600
To:	jeffw @ smoe . org (Jeff Wasilko)
Cc:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	jeffw@smoe.org's message of Sun, 9 Mar 1997 19:05:57 -0500
References:	<19970309190557.SW60759@smoe.org>

>>>>> "JW" == Jeff Wasilko <jeffw@smoe.org> writes:

JW> The new config file for test was NOT accepted because: auto+confirm at
JW> line 312 is not a valid value. Valid values are:
JW> open;closed;auto;open;open+confirm;closed+confirm

Well, looking at line 89 of config_parse.pl, auto+confirm is an explicitly
allowed value so I can't see why it wouldn't work and indeed it works for
me.  I don't know if any patches or modifications you have made might
change this, though.

 - J<

References:

Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid)
From: jeffw@smoe.org (Jeff Wasilko)

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid) From: jeffw@smoe.org (Jeff Wasilko)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Removing MS Exchange attachments? From: "Milt Webb, IQ Software" <milt@iqsc.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid) From: jeffw@smoe.org (Jeff Wasilko)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Problems with newc0nfig (auto+confirm not valid) From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>