Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Worth running MJ at <list>-request address?
From: Martin Voges <voges @ drama . unp . ac . za>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 15:21:09 +0200
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com

Hi all,

I'd appreciate any info about the (dis)advantages of running majordomo
via aliases at the <listname>-request address, please.  Is it just a
historical option, or is there real value in that approach?

BTW, if any MJ-workers are reading this, would you consider putting the
caveats about <list> being optional near the front of the "help" rather than
at the end (with "majordomo_request" turned on in the majordomo.cf)? 
User's seem to read only as far as the command they seek and miss that
important qualification.

Regards,
Martin




Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: approval/subject line
From: David Epstein <mareb@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Next: Re: Worth running MJ at <list>-request address?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: NAME REMOVAL
From: Rlkpanther@aol.com
Next: Re: Worth running MJ at <list>-request address?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com