-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "MV" == Martin Voges <voges@drama.unp.ac.za> writes:
MV> I'd appreciate any info about the (dis)advantages of running majordomo
MV> via aliases at the <listname>-request address, please. Is it just a
MV> historical option, or is there real value in that approach?
Both. The value is that you send mail to <list>, you send administrivia to
<list>-request, and the owner of th list is <list>-owner. The benefit is
that no matter what list management sofware you use you always have a
<list>-request and <list>-owner address for relevant direction of mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.0 Business Edition
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMzaXSJ6VRH7BJMxHAQHgQQQAsmgr7CFkjIVBnPOir2ovjuoVRN2ZL4UU
Rds4UqAEofzF3q2W/nCuVL2hXjdZbjKU3mXMND3Aqi9Ou06Znevq+ntSjYkkLiqA
LbYEcQr9JEeECvHpq3N8hK4qr1ePeSC2UETU156X7SO9lCJAJ+nFZJXeZPGd25i6
x1j8gSetMzg=
=pB4I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> | Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain
Prescient Technologies, Inc. | types of skin.
A Stone & Webster Company |
I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC |
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
