Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: approval/subject line
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:10:30 -0600 (CST)
To: mareb @ csv . warwick . ac . uk (David Epstein)
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <14529.199703232038@lupin.csv.warwick.ac.uk> from "David Epstein" at Mar 23, 97 08:38:45 pm
Reply-to: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>

[ David Epstein writes: ]
> 
> Dave Wolfe wrote:
> >
> >[ David Epstein writes: ]
> >> 
> >> I had a posting where there was a header
> >> Subject: Help! Other junk
> >> 
> >> The posting was sent to me for approval, which I did, piping through
> >> the official approve program. I was upset when it turned up on the
> >> list without a subject header.
> >
> >I don't suppose you saved the original BOUNCE message, did you? I can't
> >seem to reproduce your problem. What version of Mj? Do you have any
> >patches applied, esp. to approve?
> 
> We are using version 1.94.1 with perl 5. No patches have been applied
> to approve. I do not know if any patches have been applied to 1.94.1.
> (I can try to find out, but I think there haven't been any.)
>
> The original BOUNCE message now follows. It was sent twice, each time
> with the same result, that is, arriving with an empty subject field.

It worked fine for me. All I did was save it in a file and clean off
everything before the line:

> From postmaster@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Fri Mar 21 14:04:42 1997

so it looked like a mail folder and changed the bounce subject so it
would be mailed to my test list instead of your list:

> Subject: BOUNCE mathedu@warwick.ac.uk:  Admin request: /^subject:\s*help\b/i    
Subject: BOUNCE testlist@risc.sps.mot.com:  Admin request: /^subject:\s*help\b/i    
It showed up in my mailbox with the subject:

    Help! UFE applications missing

If you aren't editing the bounce message to remove the original headers,
maybe your mailer is. Looks like you're using Elm, which normally
doesn't pull such tricks (or do you have other patches in it?), but if
you used Pine to pipe the bounced message to approve, you must do it
in "raw mode" I'm told to keep Pine from editing headers for you. (Bad
Pine! No, no! No more junk mail for a week! :-)

-- 
 Dave Wolfe


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Worth running MJ at <list>-request address?
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: Worth running MJ at <list>-request address?
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: approval/subject line
From: David Epstein <mareb@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Next: Peculiar Majordomo failures
From: "Iain O'Cain" <ec@intranet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com