Majordomo-Users: Re: Invalid address: again

Majordomo-Users
(April 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Invalid address: again
From:	James Egelhof <jme9 @ cornell . edu>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 1997 20:29:42 -0400
To:	Chip Old <fold @ mail . bcpl . lib . md . us>
Cc:	Majordomo-Users List <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SOL.3.95.970415181250.27153B-100000@mail>
References:	<Pine.SOL.3.95.970415123035.2961B-100000@labpar1.cs.buap.mx>

At 06:49 PM 4/15/97 -0400, Chip Old wrote:
>Majordomo 1.91.4, Perl 5.002, Sendmail 8.6 SMI, Solaris 2.5.

I assume this majordomo version is reversed.

-james

--
 James Egelhof                                              jme9@cornell.edu
 Cornell University                                  http://www.aolsucks.org

Follow-Ups:

Re: Invalid address: again
From: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>

References:

Invalid address: again
From: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez <rgg@labpar1.cs.buap.mx>
Re: Invalid address: again
From: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: internet virus - A myth??? From: "Kenneth W. Parker" <kparker@kparker.nai.net>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Invalid address: again From: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Invalid address: again From: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Invalid address: again From: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>