Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(April 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Handling return receipts
From: Dave Barr <barr @ math . psu . edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 11:55:09 -0400
To: Roman Richardson <Roman . Richardson @ state . mn . us>
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:27:16 CDT." <2.2.32.19970417152716.006c9030@mail.state.mn.us>
References: <2.2.32.19970417152716.006c9030@mail.state.mn.us>

In message <2.2.32.19970417152716.006c9030@mail.state.mn.us>, Roman Richardson 
writes:
>   I was wondering what people do with return receipts? 

If by "return receipts" you mean the "Return-Receipt-To:" header,
the correct thing is to ignore them.  They were never a standard,
and have been officially obsoleted by DSNs, Delivery Status Notifications.
See RFC's 1891 and 1894.  Recent sendmail versions ignore Return-Receipt-To
by default and handle only DSNs.

--Dave



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: mulitiple .info files
From: Richard Dierlam <gnat@ns.kreative.net>
Next: Re: Handling return receipts
From: Roman Richardson <Roman.Richardson@state.mn.us>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Handling return receipts
From: Roman Richardson <Roman.Richardson@state.mn.us>
Next: Re: Handling return receipts
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com