I have a series of taboo-header and taboo-body expressions which catch a
large percentage of common ones. The rest just get through to the list -
the first time, anyway.
Peter
>----------
>From: Roman Richardson[SMTP:Roman.Richardson@state.mn.us]
>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 1997 4:20 PM
>To: Dave Barr
>Cc: majordomo-users@greatcircle.com
>Subject: Re: Handling return receipts
>
>At 11:55 AM 4/17/97 -0400, Dave Barr wrote:
>>In message <2.2.32.19970417152716.006c9030@mail.state.mn.us>, Roman
>>Richardson
>>writes:
>>> I was wondering what people do with return receipts? We've got a few
>>> users on systems that generate a return receipt everyt ime a message is
>>>sent
>>>to them. Unfortuantely the address that the receipt is sent back to is
>>>"Return-Path:" which points back to the actual majordomo. Is there a way
>>>to
>>>rewrite the "Return-Path:" header so that it points to the list owner?
>>
>>If by "return receipts" you mean the "Return-Receipt-To:" header,
>>the correct thing is to ignore them. They were never a standard,
>>and have been officially obsoleted by DSNs, Delivery Status Notifications.
>>See RFC's 1891 and 1894. Recent sendmail versions ignore Return-Receipt-To
>>by default and handle only DSNs.
>
>No, I'm not talking about the header, I'm talking about the message that
>get's sent back to the sender when delivery is successful. I have checked,
>and there is no way to turn them off at the user's site. And I guess I
>should have used the proper term "Delivery Status Notification".
>
>Any other thoughts?
>---
>Roman Richardson
>Information Technology Specialist 4
>Dept. of Administration / InterTechnologies Group
><mailto:Roman.Richardson@state.mn.us>
>
>
|
|
