In article <199705011625.LAA15076@miaow.risc.sps.mot.com>,
dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com (Dave Wolfe) wrote:
> Since locks, particularly lock-file locks, are purely advisory on Unix
> systems, such an approach would require the cooperation of all possible
> MTAs, which seems unlikely considering approximately none of them know
> or care about Mj in the first place. Why do you think that approach is
> "cleaner" than never allowing the window in the first place? Obviously,
> I disagree.
Well, I don't mean that the MTA should do any locking, that should be done by
majordomo when modifying the subscription list, just like any other lock used.
--
\\\\\\ Petter Nilsen - IRC: Mitchman - mailto:pettern@thule.no |\
>>>>>>============================================================| >
////// THOR Team Coordinator - http://www.thule.no/~pettern/ |/
Press any key - EXCEPT THAT ONE!!!
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
