On 5/31/97 8:59 PM, Kynn Bartlett (kynn@idyllmtn.com) wrote:
>Okay, fair enough. But I guess unless GCA wants to sue
>majordomo.com -- which they might, I dunno -- it won't matter
>until then. In other words, you and I can say it's bad, but
>unless Brent hauls 'em into court, nothing will happen.
>
>Yes?
*Unless* the registrants of majordomo.com can see that the light at the
end of the tunnel is the headlamp of an oncoming train, and decide to do
the honorable thing and voluntarily transfer the name over to the
rightful owners--thus avoiding both sides paying lots of money to lawyers
and taxing the already-overburdened legal system, when these steps can be
avoided by the appropriate party coming forth and redeeming themselves.
Think of it as the duty we have to our fellow taxpayers not to waste more
of their money, if thinking of it as the ethical and moral thing to do
isn't good enough. (I presume that it is, but I may be an idealist.)
Kirsten O.
rivrmoon@drizzle.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...awakening is never the product of force but arises through a resting
of the heart and an opening of the mind."
--Jack Kornfield, _A Path With Heart_
|
|
