Majordomo-Users: Re: problem: sendmail or majordomo?

Majordomo-Users
(June 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: problem: sendmail or majordomo?
From:	Remco van de Meent <remco @ oloon . student . utwente . nl>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 1997 23:50:22 +0200 (CEST)
To:	Lisa Kiczuk <lkiczuk @ aura . title14 . com>
Cc:	Majordomo-users Mailing list <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970601121309.15853C-100000@aura>

On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Lisa Kiczuk wrote:

[about messages in the sendmail queue to the majordomo-wrapper]

This is a sendmail problem: majordomo isn't involved in delivering to the
wrapper. Unless you moved some files ;)

bye

-- 
// Remco van de Meent	
//   email: remco@oloon.student.utwente.nl
//   www: http://oloon.student.utwente.nl
//   " Never make any mistaeks. "

References:

problem: sendmail or majordomo?
From: Lisa Kiczuk <lkiczuk@aura.title14.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: majordomo.com From: Christopher Knight <christopher.knight@sparknet.net>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Reply To From: "Mats Dufberg" <Mats.Dufberg@abc.se>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: problem: sendmail or majordomo? From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Script to trim bounces list From: "Vincent Aniello" <vincent@tao.agoron.com>