Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Reply To
From: Knotwork Admin <root @ knotwork . com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 18:22:04 -0300 (ADT)
To: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199706022044.PAA21119@Mars.mcs.net>


On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> 4. Insist that everyone using mailing lists insert the Reply-To:
>    themselves with the list address if they want their submissions
>    to a discussion list to actually be discussed instead of becoming
>    private mail.
> 
> 5. Fix the mailing list software to insert the Reply-To: header that
>    I wanted but my own mailer wouldn't insert for me.

6. Fix the User Agent to do what the User Wants. Doing what the user wants
is the User Agent's job. The problem you are decribing is a user agent
that is not in fact functioning adequately as the user's agent when
dealing with the user's mailing list interactions. This is simply the
correct means of implementing number 4 above, and makes 5 unnecessary.

The user agent needs at least two distinct types of response to an article
posting letter item or document: respond to where the document is going or
respond to the author of the document.

Blessed Be. -MarkM-

--
We do remote Linux install, config, support and administration. Inquire.
........................................................................
"The saddest thing is they WANT to be ignorant, INSIST on it in fact."




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Reply To
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Problem with digests
From: sysop@ecology.bio.dfo.ca (Bill Silvert)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Reply To
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: Reply To
From: Leslie Mikesell <les@Mcs.Net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com