-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "LM" == Leslie Mikesell <les@Mcs.Net> writes:
LM> Actually as the composer, I would like my Reply-To: to be set to
LM> the list address, except in the rare cases where I want to subvert
LM> the interesting replies only to my own mailbox instead of sharing
LM> them with the rest of the list members.
Then set it as you would. As the originator the setting of a Reply-To
header is *YOUR* perogative and responsibility; it rests with no other.
LM> However, my mailer doesn't make this easy and I'm too lazy to do
LM> it the hard way.
Too bad. Laziness -- which I have repeatedly stated was the sole
justification for the existance of reply_to -- is no reason to break
standards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.0 Business Edition
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM5M48p6VRH7BJMxHAQEgIgP/dlNDXkyPHzJE6laXDcDblmaDa5QgQnXW
QMUV4iDko3qWO9e2nLUPgmpfvTeHpwMbPI1YsrUKvkMeJZcGjzwn4hh9hpURWpCm
jdXeE+lvdHguO6nhaxV4lBpykjbJx9XR2FMWSTJg+WCYs9gvbbYfFM7pKlzg0ne6
X1ri646pkpM=
=lw3N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> | Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Prescient Technologies, Inc. |
A Stone & Webster Company |
I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC |
References:
|
|
