Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Fighting Spams
From: Michael Brennen <mbrennen @ fni . com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 18:15:56 -0500 (CDT)
To: Rich Pieri <rich . pieri @ prescienttech . com>
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <x7afl6t4ps.fsf@gkar.prescienttech.com>

On 4 Jun 1997, Rich Pieri wrote:

> >>>>> "BS" == Bill Silvert <bill@ecology.bio.dfo.ca> writes:
> 
> BS> I've been thinking that if we had a special mailing list just for
> BS> killing spams it might make life simpler. I seem to spend quite a bit
> BS> of time adding taboo entries to majordomo.cf, and it might help if
> BS> these were circulated in ready to copy-and-paste format.
> 
> As I mentioned previously, the best way to fight spam short of taking legal
> action (theft of services would be the most likely to succeed) is to
> prevent it from ever being delivered to your system.  Rejecting spam mail
> from known spam domains and spammers before it has a chance to be delivered
> reduces your system load and it sends a message to the spammers that junk
> mail is unwanted.  Routing spam to the bitbucket puts extra work on your

This is exactly what I do.  I've got a collection of class Cs that I
block, and by now about the only spam I get is what has been relayed
through a third party, usually originated from uu.net, compuserve.com,
psi.net, or some such.  Sure has reduced the spam cull time.

   -- Michael



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MAJORDOMO ABORT (mj_majordomo)
From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Next: Re: Anti-Spammer Tool, & replies
From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Fighting Spams
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: Fighting Spams
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com