Peter Bowyer recently said:
> From owner-majordomo-users-outgoing@GreatCircle.COM Fri Jun 27 11:25:31 1997
> Return-Path: <owner-majordomo-users-outgoing@GreatCircle.COM>
> Received: from camelot.dsccc.com by spd.dsccc.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
> id LAA22359; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:25:31 -0500
> Received: from offramp.dsccc.com (onramp.dsccc.com [192.1.1.139]) by camelot.dsccc.com (8.6.11/8.6.10) with SMTP id LAA25689 for <dwood@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:25:22 -0500
> Received: by offramp.dsccc.com (5.67b/SMI-V1.8)
> id AA23816; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:28:28 -0500
> Received: from relay7.uu.net(192.48.96.17) by offramp via smap (V1.3mjr)
> id sma023731; Fri Jun 27 11:28:11 1997
> Received: from honor.greatcircle.com by relay7.UU.NET with ESMTP
> (peer crosschecked as: honor.greatcircle.com [198.102.244.44])
> id QQcvtp13010; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 12:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: (majordom@localhost) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.8.5/Honor-Lists-970308-1) id IAA16526 for majordomo-users-outgoing; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from gate.insite.co.uk (gate.insite.co.uk [193.123.212.10]) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.8.5/Honor-970427-1) with SMTP id IAA16466 for <majordomo-users@greatcircle.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from picard.insite.co.uk (picard.verity.com [192.168.70.35]) by gate.insite.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA16349 for <majordomo-users@greatcircle.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 15:27:34 GMT
> Received: by picard.verity.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
> id <NR9A43B1>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 15:27:03 -0000
> Message-Id: <519947FD04D8CF11900F08000017981521637B@picard.verity.com>
> From: Peter Bowyer <pbowyer@verity.com>
> To: "'majordomo-users@greatcircle.com'" <majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM>
> Subject: RE: Need help with Majordomo
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 15:26:59 -0000
> X-Priority: 3
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Sender: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> Precedence: bulk
> content-length: 1055
>
> I have to support Rich on that one, messing with the subject is
> non-conformant and confusing. Most mail programs these days can filter
> on machine-readable items such as the From: header, without the list
> having to mess with the human-readable Subject: header.
>
> Peter
>
Ah, yes, but as you can see from the included header, above, the
From: line has your name...not the list's owner.
I'd be willing to use the 'From ' like to check, but I'm not sure if
the 'filter' that I use (from the elm package?) allows that.
Anybody know? I don't have access to the elm doc's that filter's
man page refers to check.
-- dick ( Any opinions are mine and not DSC's ) dwood@spd.dsccc.com
Richard H. Wood @ Switch Products Division, DSC Communications Corp.
1000 Coit Rd, PB1-1526, M/S 121, Plano,TX 75075-5802, USA +972-477-8624
"The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from."
-- Andrew S. Tannenbaum
References:
|
|
