Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(August 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: cpu usage
From: Leslie Mikesell <les @ Mcs . Net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 22:05:55 -0500 (CDT)
To: Thomas . Riehm @ Verwaltung . Uni-Muenchen . DE
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199708061225.OAA02559@indy.verwaltung.uni-muenchen.de> from "Thomas Riehm" at Aug 6, 97 02:25:53 pm

> > bulk mailer or tlb make a _huge_ difference here, as would a higher
> > performance MTA.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions for a "thoughtful" sendmail installation? 
> I'm hosting a list with only 150 subscribers on a rather slow Indy 
> and I'd love to get better performance as it takes several minutes 
> until all the mail is out again. Unfortunately, the users are spread 
> in many domains, so there are not more than 4-5 subscribers with the 
> same MX host.

Elapsed time and cpu usage are too different things.  Sendmail tries
to deliver an entire list of addresses in sequence in a single process
so using bulk mailer or tlb speed things up by splitting the list
into several chunks that are delivered simultaneously by different
sendmail processes which will increase the cpu load.  However, one
thing that should always help is to run a caching nameserver on the
same machine that is performing delivery.

Les Mikesell
  les@mcs.com 


References:
  • Re: cpu usage
    From: "Thomas Riehm" <Thomas.Riehm@Verwaltung.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
Indexed By Date Previous: error?
From: Michael Solomani Mifsud <solomani@aic.net.au>
Next: Bounced Messages
From: Stephen <stephen1@worldnet.att.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: cpu usage
From: "Thomas Riehm" <Thomas.Riehm@Verwaltung.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
Next: Re: cpu usage
From: netmaven@slapshot.thegeek.net

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com