Yes, it is strange that those headers are in the middle
of the mail. It is also strange that the mail is missing
TO and SUBJECT, which I'm pretty sure that Eudora always
adds. That plus that fact that the first RECIEVED header
cannot be the one resulting from Eudora sending the mail
makes me beleive that the mail was through a APPROVE,
wasn't it?
If so this is my guess:
During APPROVE some headers were removed, and during that
process the empty line between the headers and the body
was made non-empty. That empty field may not even contain
white space:
<HEADER FIELD>CRLF
<HEADER FIELD>CRLF
<HEADER FIELD>CRLF
CRLF
<BODY LINE>CRLF
<BODY LINE>CRLF
<BODY LINE>CRLF
When Majordomo receives the mail the second time the
SECOND empty line was interpreted as the end of the
headers.
/Mats Dufberg
On Sun, 09 Nov 1997 19:23:01 +0100, Per Hansen wrote:
>X-Real-To: driftsmeldinger-list
>Return-Path: <owner-driftsmeldinger@online.no>
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by online.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA26331
> for driftsmeldinger-list; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 08:42:24 +0100 (MET)
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 08:42:24 +0100 (MET)
>From: owner-driftsmeldinger@online.no
>Message-Id: <199711070742.IAA26331@online.no>
>X-UIDL: dbf7396daace1d2a39f18c534e64469f
>
>Igår, fra 13:30 til 17:00, gikk det veldig mye trafikk
>til og fra linjene til SOL. Dette medførte at det kunne
>gå tregt med å lese hjemmesider, og andre internettsider
>hos SOL. Brukere som benytter seg av terminalinnlogging,
>fikk også problemer med dette i det angitte tidsrommet.
>Sender: owner-driftsmeldinger@online.no
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: support@online.no
>
>Akkurat hva som skapte denne enorme trafikkøkningen er
>uvisst, og vi vil beklage de problemene dette har skapt
>for våre kunder.
>
>----
>Why on earth do the Sender:, Precedence: and Reply-To lines show up
>in the middle of the mail? Seems very odd to me. This mail was sent to
>the list using Eudora Pro 3.03.
------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@abc.se
|
|
