Majordomo-Users: Re: Majordomo product

Majordomo-Users
(December 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Majordomo product
From:	Dave Barr <barr @ cis . ohio-state . edu>
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 1997 12:14:33 -0500
To:	"Hall,Willis" <Willis_Hall @ wb . xerox . com>
Cc:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Wed, 10 Dec 1997 06:41:08 PST." <5BA88E348171657C5BA88E348171657C#064#X-WB-0129-MS2.XEROX@SMF>
References:	<5BA88E348171657C5BA88E348171657C#064#X-WB-0129-MS2.XEROX@SMF>

In message <5BA88E348171657C5BA88E348171657C#064#X-WB-0129-MS2.XEROX@SMF>, "Hal
l,Willis" writes:
>We are currently assessing the Xerox infrastructure for Year 2000  
> compliance. One of the products being used by a selective number of  
> users is majordomo.

There really aren't any Year 2000 issues with Majordomo.  Majordomo
doesn't handle nor care about dates (especially date comparisons).

--Dave

References:

Majordomo product
From: "Hall,Willis" <Willis_Hall@wb.xerox.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Majordomo product From: "Hall,Willis" <Willis_Hall@wb.xerox.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Majordomo product From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@cranfield.ac.uk>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Majordomo product From: "Hall,Willis" <Willis_Hall@wb.xerox.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Majordomo product From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@cranfield.ac.uk>