Majordomo-Users: Re: Majordomo version history?

Majordomo-Users
(December 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Majordomo version history?
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	12 Dec 1997 17:04:42 -0600
To:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Bill Houle's message of Fri, 12 Dec 1997 14:00:54 -0800
References:	<199712041021.EAA02026@ccsi.com> <3.0.2.32.19971212140054.009b3eb0@www.sandiegoca.ncr.com>

>>>>> "BH" == Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> writes:

BH> Why has no one bothered to point out the Changelog?!? It has version
BH> numbers going back to 1.46, and dates listed as far back as Sept'93.

I assumed the requester had already read it and it wasn't sufficient or was
too detail oriented.  After all, everyone actually looks at the information
we include in there before asking questions here, right?

 - J<

References:

Majordomo version history?
From: Michael Bluejay <bluejay@pobox.com>
Re: Majordomo version history?
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Majordomo version history? From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Indexed By Date	Next:	List owner's mail From: "Vernon L. Bailey" <vernon@citynet.net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Majordomo version history? From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Warning: bug in restrict_post & get, index commands From: Nicholas Dow <majordomo-users@nrsc.com.au>