Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Year 2000 Compliance
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J . Goldberg @ Cranfield . ac . uk>
Organization: Cranfield University Computer Centre
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:06:57 +0000 (GMT)
To: "Wales, Vince" <Vince_Wales @ csx . com>
Cc: "'Majordomo-Users @ GreatCircle . COM'" <Majordomo-Users @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <97B065F3358ED1119B240001FA6A25180150F5@TJAX1046EXCH.csxt.csx.com>
Reply-to: Jeffrey Goldberg <J . Goldberg @ Cranfield . ac . uk>

On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Wales, Vince wrote:

> I have been given the task of determining if Majordomo 1.94.4 using perl
> 5.003 is year 2000 compliant.  I don't see why it wouldn't be but I
> thought I would ask just to be on the safe side.  Thanks in advance for
> any assistance with this problem.

This was discussed a few months ago.  Yes it is complient.  And
if you use archive2.pl, use the -M switch.

Nothing in majordomo stores or manipulates dates directly.

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg                +44 (0)1234 750 111 x 2826
 Cranfield Computer Centre      FAX         751 814
 J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk     http://WWW.Cranfield.ac.uk/public/cc/cc047/
Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice.



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: list config file and private_who ...
From: Esposito Gennaro <esposito@mars.unina.it>
Next: Re: newconfig error
From: Chris Johnson <johnson@isn.dac.neu.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Year 2000 Compliance
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: re: restrict_post
From: Jonathan Wallace <jon@whoweb.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com