Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Maximum addresses
From: "Support (DCI)" <support @ faamsnet . com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:59:47 -0500 (EST)
To: Lone Deranger <memory @ blank . org>
Cc: Chris Taylor <chris @ christaylor . com>, Amy West <awest @ george . m-w . com>, majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <19980219124919.48413@blank.org>

On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Lone Deranger wrote:

> In the immortal words of Chris Taylor (chris@christaylor.com):
> > 
> > It seems to me, that on a decent PC-based OS, say FreeBSD or even Linux, you
> > could up the number of sendmail processes (assuming adequate bandwidth to
> > the machine) and send out very, very large mailing lists on a machine
> > dedicated to mailing.  Any thoughts.
> 
> Given even a sparse hardware configuration (say a pentium-90 PC with
> 32-64Mb of memory), you can tune sendmail delivery such that your
> available network bandwidth, not the machine itself, is the limiting
> factor.
> 
> http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/lisa97/21.kolstad.html
> 
> -n
> 
But did you remember the origional request? 100,000 subscribers with a
potential of over 1,000,000,000 E-mail messages a day!!! On a Pentium
90???

--Hal.




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Maximum addresses
From: Pete Ehlke <pde@listserv.music.sony.com>
Next: Re: Maximum addresses
From: "Chris Taylor" <chris@christaylor.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Maximum addresses
From: Lone Deranger <memory@blank.org>
Next: Re: Maximum addresses
From: Lone Deranger <memory@blank.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com