>let me try making things clear:
>- if you force people into getting only HTML messages - bad for
>- if you force people into getting only plain-text messages - bad for those
>who can and want HTML
>- if you offer both and give subscribers the choice - good, right?
>I intend to follow this last approach. Any drawbacks? (except one has to
>maintain 2 lists instead of just 1)
The last approach is definately fine. Choice is good, non-choice isn't.
BTW, I'm an elm user. I hate those messages that people send from Netscape
and they press the plain text and HTML send.
System Administrator - Finnigan FT/MS - Madison WI. URL:http://www.ftms.com/
phone: (608) 273-8262 ext: 612 fax: (608) 273-8719
Visit - URL:http://www.vidiot.com/ (Your link to Star Trek and UPN)