> >>>>> "SM" == Sam Michel <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> SM> Rather, I'm saying it's best to prepare for the popularisation of
> SM> HTML-enabled email. Right now, there doesn't seem to be any mailing
> SM> list package that gets close to handling this kind of thing, at least
> SM> as far as I know.
> A mailing list package is supposed to deal with messages. It doesn't care
> what's in them. What special things is a MLM supposed to do with HTML,
> besides support throwing it out?
Seeing as how HTML is controversial, it might be nice for a MLM to
allow subscriptions to a list with or without HTML. The non-html
flavor would only ship the alternative plain text and digests would be
in the traditional format.