Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(April 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Netscape Messaging Server 3.5 & Majordomo
From: Manar Hussain <manar @ ivision . co . uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:51:56 +0100
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <x7bttv1cz0.fsf@gkar.prescienttech.com>
References: <Ricardo Cerqueira's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 1998 23:44:41 +0100"><01BD6C42.3BA2AC80@mkm145.mkm.hu><353B8718.1BED2C50@mylex.com><19980420234441.A2318@ssi.aaum.pt>

>My take on qmail's security is that it appears to be more secure only
>because it has undergone less scrutiny and been subjected to fewer attacks
>than sendmail.  It is difficult to find security flaws until someone
>successfully exploits one.

If you want to argue this it should be taken elsewhere. I don't use qmail
or sendmail but I/we looked at qmail before deciding on exim. I'd probably
go with qmail if security was my one and only over-riding concern. 

Manar


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Netscape Messaging Server 3.5 & Majordomo
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: Question from a newbie :)
From: "Lazlo Nibble" <lazlo@swcp.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Netscape Messaging Server 3.5 & Majordomo
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Next: Re: Netscape Messaging Server 3.5 & Majordomo
From: Ricardo Cerqueira <rmc@ssi.aaum.pt>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com